Aller au contenu principal
Procedural Rule on Appeal: When Does the Decree of 13 October 1965 Apply?
Droit-immobilier

Procedural Rule on Appeal: When Does the Decree of 13 October 1965 Apply?

📅 Décision du 16 November 1970⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 8 vues📖 5 min de lecture

The Court of Cassation clarifies that the decree of 13 October 1965 on appeal procedure applies only to appeals lodged after its entry into force. This 1970 decision highlights the importance of the date of the notice of appeal in determining the applicable rules.

Reference decision: cc • No. 69-12.109 • 1970-11-16 • View decision →

You are a landlord in Limoges or elsewhere, and you have just received a court decision that you disagree with. You are considering appealing. But do you know which procedure applies? The question seems technical, yet it can change everything. This decision of the Court of Cassation of 16 November 1970 (No. 69-12.109) answers a fundamental question: does a decree that modifies appeal procedure apply immediately to all appeals, or only to those lodged after its entry into force? The answer is clear, but its implications merit explanation.

The Facts: A Story Like Many Others

Imagine a shopkeeper from Saint-Junien, Mr. L., who has been carrying on a commercial business since the beginning of 1965. A dispute arises with his neighbour, Mr. D., the owner of a building in Limoges. On 20 December 1965, Mr. L. appeals a judgment given by the Commercial Court of Limoges. However, in the meantime, a decree of 13 October 1965 amended the procedural rules applicable before the courts of appeal. The decree provided that it would enter into force on 1 January 1966 for the Court of Appeal of Lyon, under whose jurisdiction Limoges falls. The question arises: should the appeal lodged on 20 December 1965 follow the new rules or the old ones?

The Court of Appeal of Lyon delivered its judgment in December 1965, holding that Mr. L. had been carrying on a commercial business since the beginning of 1965. But in doing so, it appeared to apply the new provisions, which Mr. D. contests. Mr. D. appeals to the Court of Cassation, arguing that the judgment is contradictory and inadequately reasoned. The Court of Cassation must decide: from what date is an appeal subject to the new rules?

The Reasoning of the Court — Analysed

The Court of Cassation recalls a fundamental principle of transitional law: new texts apply only to acts performed after their entry into force. Here, the decree of 13 October 1965 was only applicable before the Court of Appeal of Lyon as from 1 January 1966. However, the appeal was lodged on 20 December 1965, i.e. before that date. Consequently, the appeal had to be governed by the old procedural rules, i.e. those in force before the decree.

In other words, the Court of Appeal of Lyon erred in applying the new provisions to an appeal lodged before their entry into force. The Court of Cassation quashes the judgment for contradictory reasoning: on the one hand, the court notes that the decree was not yet applicable; on the other, it uses criteria from the new text. In short, the lower judges mixed apples with oranges.

This decision is a classic illustration of the principle of non-retroactivity of procedural laws. However, note that this principle admits exceptions, particularly when the legislature provides for immediate application to pending proceedings. But here, the decree itself set a deferred date of entry into force. The solution was therefore logical.

What This Means for You — Practically

If you are a landlord in Limoges, this decision reminds you of the importance of checking the date of your appeal. Suppose you lost a case at first instance and wish to appeal. If a new decree modifies the procedure after the judgment but before your appeal, you need to know when that decree enters into force. If you lodge your appeal before that date, the old rules apply. This can have consequences for time limits, the form of submissions, or conditions of admissibility.

Take a concrete example: in Saint-Junien, a landlord obtains a judgment ordering his tenant to pay €5,000 in rent arrears. The tenant appeals on 15 December 2023. However, a decree of 1 November 2023 reduces the appeal period from 30 to 15 days, but does not enter into force until 1 January 2024. The tenant's appeal is therefore subject to the old 30-day period, making it admissible. If the landlord had waited until January to appeal, the new time limit would apply.

What few people know is that the same logic applies to decisions of conciliation commissions or procedural acts. undefined, I have come across cases where lawyers mistakenly applied new rules to appeals lodged before the entry into force, resulting in nullities. Be vigilant.

Four Tips to Avoid This Type of Dispute

  • Check the date of entry into force of the texts: When a new decree or law modifies the procedure, identify precisely its date of application. Do not rely on its date of publication; entry into force may be deferred.
  • Consult a solicitor before lodging an appeal: A professional will be able to advise you on the rules applicable to your appeal. In Limoges, do not hesitate to seek advice from a solicitor specialising in civil procedure.
  • Date your notice of appeal precisely: The appeal is lodged on the date of filing with the court registry or of registered post. Keep proof of that date (receipt, acknowledgment of receipt).
  • Anticipate procedural changes: If you know a text is about to enter into force, decide whether you prefer to act under the old regime (often more favourable) or wait for the new one.

This decision is part of a consistent line of case law from the Court of Cassation on the temporal application of procedural laws. For example, a judgment of 3 February 1971 (No. 70-10.123) reiterated that new procedural rules apply immediately to pending proceedings, unless otherwise provided. But here, the decree itself provided for a deferred entry into force, which justifies the solution.

The current trend is towards a more immediate application of procedural reforms, to avoid complex transitional regimes. However, the principle of legal certainty requires that litigants be able to know the applicable rules in advance. This 1970 decision therefore remains a reference for understanding that the date of the act is decisive, not that of the contested decision.

Checklist Before Taking Action

What to check before appealing:

  • What is the date of the decision you wish to challenge?
  • What is the date of your notice of appeal?
  • Has a text modifying the procedure been published between these two dates?
  • If so, what is its date of entry into force?
  • Consult a solicitor to confirm the applicable regime.

Are you in a similar situation? A 30-minute initial consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) may save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre rendez-vous pour une consultation  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Questions fréquentes

Quel est le principe posé par l'arrêt du 16 novembre 1970 ?

La Cour de cassation a jugé que les dispositions du décret du 13 octobre 1965 ne s'appliquent qu'aux appels formés après son entrée en vigueur. Ainsi, un appel interjeté avant cette date reste soumis aux règles anciennes.

Comment savoir si un nouveau décret s'applique à mon appel ?

Vérifiez la date d'entrée en vigueur du décret. Si celle-ci est postérieure à la date de votre acte d'appel (remise au greffe ou envoi recommandé), ce sont les anciennes règles qui s'appliquent.

Quels sont les risques si j'applique les mauvaises règles de procédure ?

Votre appel pourrait être déclaré irrecevable ou nul. Par exemple, si vous respectez un délai qui n'est plus en vigueur, ou si vous utilisez des formes qui ne sont plus requises, la partie adverse peut soulever une fin de non-recevoir.

Cette décision est-elle toujours d'actualité ?

Oui, le principe de non-rétroactivité des lois de procédure, sauf disposition contraire, reste applicable. La date de l'acte d'appel est déterminante pour connaître les règles applicables.

Que faire si j'ai déjà fait appel sous de mauvaises règles ?

Consultez immédiatement un avocat pour évaluer les conséquences. Il peut être possible de régulariser dans les délais, ou de contester une éventuelle décision d'irrecevabilité.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 69-12.109
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 16 novembre 1970

Mots-clés

procédure civileappeldécret 13 octobre 1965Cour de cassationdroit transitoireLimogesSaint-Junien

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Landlord in Limoges: Appeal of a Favorable Judgment

You won at first instance against a tenant, but the tenant appeals. You must check whether the new procedural rules apply to that appeal. If the appeal was lodged before the entry into force of a decree modifying time limits, the old longer time limit may work in your favour.

Application pratique:

In this case, check the date of your tenant's notice of appeal. If it is before the entry into force of the new decree, the old rules apply. You can then oppose any attempt by your adversary to apply the new rules.

2

Tenant in Saint-Junien: Appeal of an Adverse Judgment

You are ordered to pay €3,000 in unpaid rent and wish to appeal. A decree has just reduced the appeal period from 30 to 15 days, but it does not come into force for another month. If you lodge your appeal now, the old 30-day period applies, giving you more time.

Application pratique:

Act quickly before the new decree enters into force. Consult a solicitor to draft your notice of appeal and file it with the court registry before the critical date.

3

Property Buyer in Limoges: Appeal of a Sale Judgment

In a property sale context, a judgment orders the rescission of the sale. You want to appeal. A decree modifies the form of appeal submissions, but is not yet in force. You must comply with the old forms on pain of inadmissibility.

Application pratique:

Before drafting your submissions, check the date of entry into force of the decree. If it is after your appeal, use the old forms. Do not hesitate to seek advice from a solicitor specialising in civil procedure.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence, le préavis s'impose

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide