Aller au contenu principal
According to Article R
Droit Immobilier

According to Article R

📅 Décision du 09 November 2022⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 14 vues📖 2 min de lecture

According to Article R. 223-32 of the French Commercial Code, when a derivative action is brought by a shareholder, the court may only rule if the company has been duly joined through its legal representatives. The court may appoint an ad hoc representative to represent the company in the proceedings where there is a conflict of interest between the company and its legal representatives. It follows that a derivative action brought by a shareholder is admissible only if the company is properly represented in the proceedings. Where there is a conflict of interest between the company and its legal representative, the company can only be properly represented by an ad hoc representative, which the judge must appoint at the request of the shareholder or legal representative or, as the case may be, on his own motion.

Reference decision: cc • N° 20-19.077 • 2022-11-09 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is how it affects you.

The situation

According to Article R. 223-32 of the French Commercial Code, when a derivative action is brought by a shareholder, the court may only rule if the company has been duly joined through its legal representatives. The court may appoint an ad hoc representative to represent the company in the proceedings where there is a conflict of interest between the company and its legal representatives. It follows that a derivative action brought by a shareholder is admissible only if the company is properly represented in the proceedings. Where there is a conflict of interest between the company and its legal representative, the company can only be properly represented by an ad hoc representative, which the judge must appoint at the request of the shareholder or legal representative or, as the case may be, on his own motion.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for bringing an action
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, deeds, correspondence)
  • Be proactive: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30 min consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 20-19.077
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 09 novembre 2022

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide