Reference Decision: cc • No. 18-20.119 • 2019-10-24 • View the decision →
Picture the scene: you have just bought a lovely house in Valbonne, with a garden that opens onto a small path. Except that the seller, a few years ago, signed a paper renouncing the use of this path, in exchange for €10,000. Today, the neighbour says: "Sorry, you no longer have the right to pass." What can you do? This is exactly the question that arose in a recent case decided by the Cour de cassation. And the answer is clear: the buyer is not bound by the renunciation of his predecessor. Explanations.
The Facts: A Story That Happens Every Day
Mr. B..., owner of a plot in Valbonne, had a landlocked plot (no direct access to the public highway). To access it, he used a right of way (the right to pass over another's land) that ran along the property of Mr. U..., his neighbour. In 2003, Mr. B... renounced this right of way for €10,000. He then found himself without any legal access to his plot. A few years later, Mr. B... sold his land to a buyer, Mr. C... The latter, when trying to use the path, was met with refusal from Mr. U..., who opposed him with the 2003 renunciation. Mr. C... then took the matter to court to have his right to a legal right of way recognised (the one granted by law to the owner of a landlocked plot). The tribunal de grande instance of Grasse ruled in his favour, and the cour d'appel of Aix-en-Provence confirmed. Mr. U... appealed to the Cour de cassation, but the Cour de cassation dismissed his appeal, upholding the buyer's right.
The Reasoning of the Court — Analysed
The central question was: can the buyer of a landlocked plot be opposed by his seller's renunciation of the right of way? The judges answered no. Why? Because the legal right of way (Article 682 of the Civil Code) is attached to the land (the plot), not to the person of the owner. In other words, it is the land that has a right to access, not the owner. When Mr. B... renounced the right of way, he performed a personal act that cannot bind subsequent owners. Otherwise, the land would remain landlocked forever, which would be contrary to the public interest. The Court recalls that renunciation of a legal right of way must be express and cannot be opposed to the buyer if it has not been published in the land registry (which was not the case here). In short, Mr. B...'s renunciation has no effect on Mr. C..., who can therefore claim a right of way. This reasoning is consistent with established case law: the legal right of way is a real right, independent of the person.
What This Means for You — Practically
This decision is good news for buyers of landlocked plots. If you buy a property without access, you can demand a right of way, even if the seller had renounced this right. However, be careful: the landlocking must be genuine (no adequate access to the public highway). For example, in Nice, an owner of a flat in a condominium could find themselves blocked if the access path is cut off. But here, the right to a right of way revives. In practice, if you are in this situation, you must: 1) check that there is no adequate access; 2) ask the neighbour for an amicable right of way; 3) if refused, take the matter to court to obtain compensation. Legal and expert fees can range from €2,000 to €5,000, but the stakes are often much higher (value of the land). For sellers, be cautious: a renunciation of a right of way can reduce the value of your property, as the buyer might challenge it.
Four Tips to Avoid This Type of Dispute
- Check easements before buying: Consult the cadastre and the title deed. If an easement is mentioned, inquire about its actual existence. A surveyor can help.
- Do not renounce an easement without thinking: If you are an owner, know that a renunciation may be final for you, but not for your successors. Better to seek an alternative solution (land exchange, etc.).
- Have any deed published in the land registry: A renunciation or agreement must be published to be enforceable against third parties. Otherwise, it may be unenforceable against a buyer.
- Consult a solicitor if in doubt: Before signing a contract of sale, have the easements and risks of landlocking analysed. A few hundred euros can save you a lawsuit.
Further Reading: Related Case Law and Developments
This decision confirms earlier case law: the Cour de cassation has already ruled that renunciation of a legal right of way is not enforceable against subsequent owners (Civ. 3e, 10 March 1993, No. 91-12.042). Similarly, the buyer can always demand a legal right of way if the landlocking is proven, even if the seller had renounced (Civ. 3e, 4 May 2011, No. 10-14.369). The trend is therefore protective of the buyer. In future, sellers will have to be transparent about easements, or risk liability for failure to disclose information.
Summary and Next Steps
FAQ:
- Can I pass over my neighbour's land if my plot is landlocked? Yes, you are entitled to a legal right of way, even if the previous owner renounced it.
- What if the neighbour refuses? You can take the matter to the tribunal judiciaire to have your right recognised and compensation fixed.
- What are the timeframes? The procedure can take 6 months to 2 years depending on complexity. Mediation can speed things up.
- How much does it cost? Expect between €2,000 and €5,000 in legal and expert fees, but the compensation due to the neighbour is often modest (a few hundred to a few thousand euros).
Besoin d'un conseil personnalisé ? Contactez Maître Zakine — première consultation 30 min à 45€.
Are you in a similar situation? A 30-minute initial consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of litigation — and often much more. Book an appointment →
