Aller au contenu principal
International succession in France: EU Regulation 650/2012 and the applicable law
Droit-immobilier

International succession in France: EU Regulation 650/2012 and the applicable law

📅 Décision du 17 June 2021⚖️ Cour de cassation 1re civ.👁️ 11 vues📖 4 min de lecture

<p>European Regulation 650/2012 unifies the rules on international succession. The judgment of the Court of Cassation of 17 June 2021 (No. 19-24.871) clarifies the relationship between the Regulation and French law, particularly with regard to immovable property. Maître Cécile Zakine assists you in optimising your cross-border succession.</p>

Case Reference: Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber, 17 June 2021, appeal no. 19-24.871, published in the Bulletin.

International Succession in France: EU Regulation 650/2012 and the Applicable Law

Are you a foreign national, non-resident or expatriate, and do you own real estate in France? The question of the succession to this property is crucial. Since 17 August 2015, European Regulation No. 650/2012 (the "Succession Regulation") has unified the conflict-of-law rules governing international successions within the European Union. However, its interaction with French law, particularly with regard to assets situated in France, was clarified by a significant judgment of the Court of Cassation dated 17 June 2021 (appeal no. 19-24.871). This article explains the key points and how Maître Cécile Zakine can assist you.

1. EU Regulation 650/2012: The Principle of Unity of the Succession

Regulation 650/2012 establishes that the law applicable to an entire international succession is that of the deceased's last habitual residence. This principle of unity aims to avoid the fragmentation of the succession across multiple legal systems. However, the Regulation permits the deceased to choose, by will, the law of his or her nationality (prorogation of jurisdiction).

For non-EU nationals, the Regulation may apply if the deceased was resident in a Member State at the time of death, or if the assets are located in a Member State. France applies the Regulation even to successions of non-Europeans, subject to French mandatory rules.

2. The Judgment of 17 June 2021: Scope and Analysis

In this case, a deceased person of foreign nationality (non-EU) was resident in France. His estate included real property situated in France. The issue was whether French law (as the law of the residence) applied to the entire succession, or whether the deceased's national law could be retained for certain aspects.

The Court of Cassation reiterated that Regulation 650/2012 is of universal application: even for a non-European deceased, if his or her last habitual residence was in France, French law applies to the entire succession, including real property situated in France. It further specified that French mandatory rules (public policy, reserved share of inheritance) prevail, even if the foreign law chosen by the deceased is different.

In the instant case, the deceased had attempted to subject his succession to his national law (which did not recognise the reserved share). The Court held that the reserved share of inheritance for children (Article 912 of the Civil Code) is a matter of public policy and applies whenever French law is competent. Consequently, a protected heir cannot be deprived of his or her share by a choice of foreign law.

3. Practical Consequences for Foreign Property Owners

If you are a foreign national and own property in France, here are the points to bear in mind:

  • Habitual Residence: If you are resident in France at the time of your death, French law will govern your entire succession, including assets abroad (unless you have chosen your national law by will).
  • Choice of Law: You may, by will, choose the law of your nationality for your succession (Article 22 of the Regulation). This choice must be express and comply with the formal requirements for wills.
  • Reserved Share of Inheritance: Even in the event of a choice of foreign law, protected heirs (children, spouse) may invoke the French reserved share if the asset is situated in France and French law is subsidiarily competent (Article 913 of the Civil Code).
  • Taxation: Inheritance tax in France is due on assets situated in France, regardless of the deceased's domicile (Article 750 ter of the French General Tax Code). International tax treaties may prevent double taxation.

4. How Maître Cécile Zakine Can Assist You

As a lawyer specialising in property law and private international law, I offer tailored assistance:

  • Advance Advice: Analysis of your family and asset situation to determine the applicable law and optimise your succession (will, gift, choice of law).
  • Drafting of International Wills: Compliance with the formalities of Regulation 650/2012 and French law to ensure the validity of your wishes.
  • Management of Conflicts of Laws: Negotiation with heirs and foreign authorities to avoid disputes.
  • Tax Optimisation: Review of international tax treaties and applicable provisions to minimise the tax burden on your succession.

Besoin d'un conseil personnalisé ? Contactez Maître Zakine — première consultation 30 min à 45€.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 19-24.871
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation 1re civ.
  • Date de décision: 17 juin 2021

Mots-clés

étrangernon-résidentsuccession internationalerèglement UE 650/2012réserve héréditairedroit immobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence, le préavis s'impose

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide