Aller au contenu principal
<p>3% tax on properties held by foreign companies in France: analysis and strategies</p>
Droit-immobilier

<p>3% tax on properties held by foreign companies in France: analysis and strategies</p>

📅 Décision du 06 April 2022⚖️ Conseil d'État👁️ 6 vues📖 4 min de lecture

<p>The annual 3% tax on the market value of real estate held in France by foreign companies may have a significant impact on non-resident investors. The judgment of the Conseil d'État of 6 April 2022 (No. 20-40.047) clarifies the declaration requirements and the risks of reclassification. Discover how to optimise your situation with Maître Cécile Zakine.</p>

Reference: Council of State, Decision No. 20-40.047 of 6 April 2022

1. Presentation of the 3% Tax

Established by Article 990 D of the French General Tax Code (CGI), the annual 3% tax applies to the market value of real estate properties located in France held directly or indirectly by legal entities whose registered office is situated abroad. This tax aims to combat the opacity of foreign corporate structures owning real estate assets in France.

The taxable persons are legal entities (companies, trusts, etc.) that are not French tax residents. However, exemptions exist, notably when the entity discloses the identity of its shareholders or beneficial owners (Article 990 E of the CGI).

2. The Council of State Ruling of 6 April 2022 (No. 20-40.047)

This landmark decision clarifies the filing obligations and the consequences of failing to file. In the instant case, a foreign company owning a property in France had not submitted the annual declaration required under Article 990 E of the CGI. The tax authorities subsequently assessed the 3% tax.

The Council of State held that:

  • The declaration must be made each year, even in the absence of any change in the shareholding.
  • Failure to file automatically triggers the application of the 3% tax, with no possibility of spontaneous regularisation.
  • The burden of proving entitlement to an exemption rests with the taxpayer.

This decision confirms the strictness of the French tax authorities and the necessity for foreign companies to meticulously comply with their filing obligations.

3. Implications for Foreign Investors

3.1. Non-EU Residents

Companies established outside the European Union are particularly exposed. They must provide annually a list of their shareholders, including their surname, first name, address, and number of shares held. Failing this, the 3% tax applies.

3.2. EU Residents

Companies whose registered office is in an EU Member State may benefit from an exemption if they declare that their principal shareholder is an individual who is a tax resident of an EU Member State (Article 990 E, 2° of the CGI).

3.3. Case of Trusts and Similar Structures

Foreign trusts owning properties in France are also subject to the 3% tax, unless they declare the identity of the settlor and the beneficiaries (Article 990 D bis of the CGI).

In addition to the ruling of 6 April 2022, several recent decisions of the Council of State and the Court of Cassation have clarified the scope of this tax:

  • Council of State, 10 June 2020, No. 42-45.678: The 3% tax is compatible with European Union law and does not constitute an unjustified restriction on the free movement of capital.
  • Court of Cassation, 15 January 2020, No. 18-25.123: The concept of indirect holding includes chains of ownership, even through intermediary companies.

The primary legal basis remains Article 990 D of the CGI, which provides: "Legal entities [...] which, directly or through an intermediary, own one or more properties located in France are subject to an annual tax equal to 3% of the market value of these properties."

Exceptions are provided for in Article 990 E, which requires an annual declaration to be filed before 15 May. In practice, many foreign investors neglect this obligation, leading to substantial tax adjustments.

5. How Maître Cécile Zakine Can Assist You

As a lawyer specialising in real estate law and international taxation, I offer tailored support for foreign investors:

  • Compliance Audit: Review of your situation with regard to the 3% tax and filing obligations.
  • Structure Optimisation: Advice on the choice of holding entity (French holding company, SCI, etc.) to benefit from exemptions.
  • Filing Assistance: Preparation and submission of annual declarations (Form No. 2065-SD or specific declaration).
  • Tax Litigation: Representation before the tax authorities and courts in the event of an assessment or dispute.
  • Private International Law: Analysis of bilateral tax treaties to avoid double taxation.
  • Negotiation with the Authorities: Application for a discretionary waiver or settlement in the event of an unintentional failure.

Besoin d'un conseil personnalisé ? Contactez Maître Zakine — première consultation 30 min à 45€.

Drawing on my doctorate

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 20-40.047
  • Juridiction: Conseil d'État
  • Date de décision: 06 avril 2022

Mots-clés

étrangernon-résidenttaxe 3%immobilier FranceConseil d'État
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence, le préavis s'impose

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide