Aller au contenu principal
Right of pre-emption and foreign buyer: can the municipality block the sale?
Droit-immobilier

Right of pre-emption and foreign buyer: can the municipality block the sale?

📅 Décision du 09 November 2022⚖️ Cour de cassation 3e civ.👁️ 7 vues📖 4 min de lecture

<p>A recent judgment of the Court of Cassation (21-17.892 of 9 November 2022) clarifies the limits of the right of pre-emption of municipalities in respect of foreign purchasers. An analysis of the risks and solutions for non-residents.</p>

Reference: Court of Cassation, 3rd Civil Chamber, 9 November 2022, No. 21-17.892

Introduction: A Sword of Damocles over Acquisition by a Foreign National

Acquiring real property in France as a foreign national (from outside the EU or as a non-resident) may appear straightforward, but the right of pre-emption held by municipalities constitutes an often overlooked obstacle. By means of this tool, a municipality may substitute itself for the purchaser and acquire the property in their stead, subject to certain conditions. The judgment of 9 November 2022 of the third civil chamber of the Court of Cassation (No. 21-17.892) serves as a reminder that this right is not absolute and that the foreign purchaser has legal remedies available.

1. The Right of Pre-emption: Reminder of Principles

Established by the Law of 5 July 1985, the Urban Pre-emption Right (DPU) allows municipalities to become the priority purchaser of a property put up for sale, within areas defined by their Local Urban Plan (PLU). The objective is to control land for projects of general interest (social housing, public facilities, etc.).

The mechanism is simple: the seller must notify the municipality of their intention to sell (Declaration of Intention to Alienate, DIA). The municipality then has a period of two months to exercise its right of pre-emption at the declared price. If it does not respond, the sale may proceed freely.

1.1. The Foreign Purchaser Facing the DPU

The law does not distinguish based on the nationality of the purchaser. In theory, the DPU applies in the same manner to any buyer. However, in practice, municipalities may be tempted to pre-empt a property to prevent it from falling into the hands of a foreign national, particularly in tourist or sensitive areas. The 2022 judgment illustrates this situation: a municipality had pre-empted a property sold to a Swiss national, arguing the necessity of maintaining housing prices for local residents.

2. Analysis of Judgment 21-17.892: The Court of Cassation Restricts the DPU

In this case, the municipality of Saint-Jean-de-Luz had pre-empted a house sold to a non-resident Swiss couple. The purchasers challenged the decision before the courts, arguing that the municipality had not provided a sufficient reason of general interest. The Court of Cassation ruled in their favour, annulling the pre-emption.

The High Court recalled that the right of pre-emption may only be exercised for a clearly identified and proportionate reason of general interest. In this instance, the municipality invoked the "preservation of social mix" and the fight against "property speculation". However, the Court held that these reasons were too general and unsupported by concrete elements (absence of a specific development project).

2.1. Lessons for the Foreign Purchaser

This judgment is a victory for foreign purchasers. It enshrines the principle that a municipality cannot pre-empt a property solely on the ground that the purchaser is a foreign national or non-resident. The decision must be based on a real and documented project. In the absence of such a project, the pre-emption is abusive.

Legal references:

  • Articles L. 211-1 et seq. of the Urban Planning Code (DPU)
  • Article L. 213-1 of the same Code (time limits and procedure)
  • Consistent case law: Cass. 3e civ., 9 Nov. 2022, No. 21-17.892

3. Other Risks for the Foreign Purchaser

Beyond the DPU, the non-resident foreign national must be vigilant on several points:

  • Taxation: Capital gains on real property are taxed in France, even for a non-resident. Tax treaties may avoid double taxation (e.g., the Franco-Swiss treaty).
  • Private International Law: The matrimonial property regime and succession law may impact the holding of the property. It is advisable to draft a will or choose a corporate structure (SCI).
  • Exchange Controls: Fund transfers for the acquisition must be declared (capital transfer declaration).

Besoin d'un conseil personnalisé ? Contactez Maître Zakine — première consultation 30 min à 45€.

4. How Maître Zakine Can Assist You

Faced with these issues, the assistance of a specialised lawyer is crucial. Maître Cécile Zakine, Doctor of Law and Attorney at the Paris Bar, offers you expert knowledge in international real estate law.

4.1. Negotiation and Securing the Sale

Before signing, we verify that the municipality has not exercised its DPU or has done so abusively. In the event of a pre-emption, we challenge the decision before the administrative court, relying on recent case law.

4.2. Tax Optimisation and Structuring

We advise you on the best holding structure (SCI, co-ownership) to minimise tax and facilitate transmission. We analyse the applicable tax treaties.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 21-17.892
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation 3e civ.
  • Date de décision: 09 novembre 2022

Mots-clés

étrangernon-résidentdroit de préemptionCour de cassationimmobilier France
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit-immobilier

Voir tout →

Servitude de passage et tierce opposition : protéger son droit d'accès en copropriété

Un copropriétaire peut-il s'opposer à la suppression d'une servitude de passage qui profite à son lot, même si le syndicat accepte la fin de l'enclave ? La Cour de cassation répond oui, reconnaissant un intérêt distinct pour agir en tierce opposition.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Enclave et servitude : quand le droit du travail ne crée pas de passage forcé

La Cour de cassation rappelle que l'état d'enclave d'un fonds ne peut résulter des obligations réglementaires imposées aux entreprises en matière d'issues et dégagements. Ainsi, un propriétaire ne peut exiger un passage sur le fonds voisin au seul motif que son bâtiment doit respecter des normes de sécurité incendie.

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence, le préavis s'impose

Lorsque, faute de convention écrite ou dans le silence de cette convention, les parties à un contrat de transport public routier de marchandises n'ont pas stipulé une durée de préavis de rupture, cette durée est fixée par un contrat-type approuvé par décret pris en application de l'article L. 1432-4 du code des transports. Les dispositions de l'article L. 442-6, I, 5°, devenu L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce ne trouvent alors pas à s'appliquer. Il en va de même lorsque la convention écrite renvoie expressément à la clause du contrat-type fixant une telle durée. Lorsque les parties ont conclu un contrat écrit stipulant la durée du préavis de rupture, les dispositions de l'article L. 442-1, II, du code de commerce sont applicables. Dans cette hypothèse, l'auteur de la rupture qui a consenti à son partenaire un délai de préavis au moins égal à celui prévu au contrat-type dans sa version en vigueur à la date de la notification de la rupture, ne saurait voir sa responsabilité engagée sur le fondement de ce texte

23 juil. 2026Lire →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit droit-immobilier

Tous les articles Droit-immobilier
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide