Aller au contenu principal
Premises cannot at the same time be
Droit Immobilier

Premises cannot at the same time be

📅 Décision du 29 October 1970⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 13 vues📖 2 min de lecture

Premises cannot at the same time be classified as both principal and ancillary within the meaning of the decree of 30 September 1953; the principal premises in which the business is carried on may encompass several leases covering multiple buildings. Since a sub-tenant carries on, with the knowledge and consent of the lessor, a business in an adjacent building, and was authorised to break through the wall separating the two buildings to facilitate the operation of the business, the courts may consider that this linking of the two premises, used for the same business, gives the sub-let premises the character of principal premises within the meaning of the aforesaid decree.

Reference decision: Court of Cassation • N° 69-10.361 • 1970-10-29 • View decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

Premises cannot at the same time be classified as both principal and ancillary within the meaning of the decree of 30 September 1953; the principal premises in which the business is carried on may encompass several leases covering multiple buildings. Since a sub-tenant carries on, with the knowledge and consent of the lessor, a business in an adjacent building, and was authorised to break through the wall separating the two buildings to facilitate the operation of the business, the courts may consider that this linking of the two premises, used for the same business, gives the sub-let premises the character of principal premises within the meaning of the aforesaid decree.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points

  • Strictly respect the statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (deeds, instruments, letters)
  • Plan ahead: preventive advice is always cheaper than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-min consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 69-10.361
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 29 octobre 1970

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Google Reviews

Does this affect you?

Consult Maître Zakine — lawyer, Doctor of Law. Fast, clear answer.

Book a consultation →

🔒 Confidential · No obligation

📬 Get legal updates

One legal analysis per week, straight to your inbox. Free, no spam.

🔒 1-click unsubscribe · GDPR compliant

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide