Droit Immobilier

A managing agent appointed by a meeting of

📅 Décision du 20 June 1978⚖️ Cour de cassation📖 2 min de lecture

A managing agent appointed by a meeting of co-owners may only be revoked by that meeting; it is not for the court, which appoints a judicial administrator in the event of the managing agent being prevented or failing to act, to terminate the functions of the said managing agent.

Reference decision: cc • No. 76-15.154 • 1978-06-20 • Consult the decision →

This decision sheds important light on your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

A managing agent appointed by a meeting of co-owners may only be revoked by that meeting; it is not for the court, which appoints a judicial administrator in the event of the managing agent's impediment or failure to act, to terminate the functions of the said managing agent.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points

  • Strictly observe the statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, deeds, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 76-15.154
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 20 juin 1978

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Co-owner seeks court removal of negligent managing agent

Marie, a co-owner in a 20-unit block in Nice, has endured two years of delayed maintenance and missing funds. Furious after a burst pipe went unfixed for months, costing her €3,000 in damages, she petitions the local court to dismiss the managing agent immediately.

Application pratique:

This case law establishes that only a vote at the co-owners' general meeting can revoke a managing agent. Marie must instead rally fellow co-owners to call an extraordinary general meeting (EGM) by collecting signatures from co-owners holding at least 25% of votes, then propose a resolution to revoke the agent. She should prepare a detailed file of evidence (photos, invoices, correspondence) to persuade neighbours. Acting without a meeting risks her petition being rejected, wasting court fees and time.

2

Landlord faces rental void due to incompetent block management

John, a London-based investor, owns a buy-to-let flat in Lyon managed by a co-ownership agent who has neglected building insurance renewal. A water leak in the roof has rendered his property uninhabitable, causing a €1,200 monthly rental loss for six months. He considers legal action to replace the agent directly.

Application pratique:

Despite John’s status as a non-resident landlord, French co-ownership law applies equally: he cannot bypass the co-owners' vote, even with clear evidence of mismanagement causing direct financial harm. He must contact the property manager or other co-owners to request an EGM, or if the agent’s inaction threatens the building’s safety, request a court-appointed provisional administrator — but that administrator cannot automatically terminate the agent. John should document all financial losses and communicate the urgency to the co-ownership council to build consensus for revocation.

3

First-time buyer hesitates over apartment in fractious co-ownership

Emily, a first-time buyer from Bristol, is considering purchasing a studio in Bordeaux listed at €180,000. During her due diligence, she discovers that the managing agent is suing several co-owners for unpaid fees and the co-owners’ attempts to sack him have been blocked by the court. She fears inheriting legal chaos.

Application pratique:

This decision means Emily can't rely on a court to clean house — the co-owners’ meeting must act, which requires majority cooperation that seems lacking. Before buying, she should review the co-ownership’s minutes (procès-verbaux) for the last three years to gauge attendance and voting patterns. She should also examine the sinking fund (fonds de travaux) and dispute history. If the co-ownership is deadlocked, she could negotiate a lower price to cover future legal hassles, or walk away. Consulting a notaire specialised in copropriété is essential to assess risks.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45