A trade mark may not benefit from the

Application pratique:

The Court of Cassation emphasises strict compliance with statutory deadlines. Under French law, Sophie must file a hidden defect claim within two years of discovery. She should immediately gather the surveyor's report, photos, and correspondence with the seller, then instruct a solicitor to issue formal proceedings. Early legal advice could prevent the claim becoming time-barred.

Application pratique:

This case highlights the necessity of following prescribed legal procedures. Marc must serve a formal notice to pay (commandement de payer) via a bailiff. If the tenant does not pay within two months, he can then file an eviction claim. Keeping all rent receipts, the lease, and the bailiff's notice is essential to prove the breach. The Court of Cassation decision reinforces that missing procedural deadlines can irreparably weaken your case.

Application pratique:

The Court of Cassation decision underlines that property law hinges on adhering to appeal periods. A co-owner has just two months from the general meeting to challenge a vote in court. Claire should have immediately obtained the minutes and sought legal advice. Now, her claim is likely inadmissible. Future co-owners must mark the deadline in their calendar, keep all meeting documents, and consult a lawyer preventively.