Droit Immobilier

Violates Article R

📅 Décision du 18 December 2013⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 3 vues📖 2 min de lecture

A court of appeal violates Article R. 13-22 of the Expropriation for Public Utility Code when, in order to hold that the requirements of that article have been complied with, it finds that the expropriating party proves that, on the day the expropriation judge was seised, it sent to the expropriated party its memorial containing the proposed compensation offer, without noting that the application lodged with the expropriation judge mentioned the date of notification to the defendant of the claimant's memorial.

Reference decision: Court of Cassation • No. 12-28.601 • 2013-12-18 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

A court of appeal violates Article R. 13-22 of the Expropriation for Public Utility Code when, in order to hold that the requirements of that article have been complied with, it finds that the expropriating party proves that, on the day the expropriation judge was seised, it sent to the expropriated party its memorial containing the proposed compensation offer, without noting that the application lodged with the expropriation judge mentioned the date of notification to the defendant of the claimant's memorial.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Strictly comply with the statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, instruments, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
→ Prendre RDV pour une consultation droit du travail  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 12-28.601
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 18 décembre 2013

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudenceimmobilier
Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide