Aller au contenu principal
The party wall presupposing the existence
Droit-foncier

The party wall presupposing the existence

📅 Décision du 18 May 1994⚖️ Cour de cassation👁️ 5 vues📖 2 min de lecture

Since the party wall presupposes the existence of two contiguous buildings, when one of them disappears, the effects attached by law to the party wall cease, leaving only those resulting from co-ownership.

Reference decision: cc • No. 92-19.763 • 1994-05-18 • View decision →

This decision provides important clarification on your property law. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

Since the party wall presupposes the existence of two contiguous buildings, when one of them disappears, the effects attached by law to the party wall cease, leaving only those resulting from co-ownership.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Strictly respect the statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (titles, deeds, correspondence)
  • Anticipate: preventive advice always costs less than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30 min consultation at €45 with Maître Zakine.

📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Cécile Zakine, French real estate lawyer, practises throughout France.
servitude-droit-passage-avocat/" rel="dofollow">→ Avocat servitudes & foncier  |  → Browse all our legal articles

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 92-19.763
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 18 mai 1994

Mots-clés

droit immobilierjurisprudencefoncier

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Demolition of adjacent building ends party wall

Sophie owns a terraced house in Lyon (Lyon). Her neighbour demolishes his house to rebuild, leaving a gap. The party wall that existed between the two houses is now exposed on Sophie's side.

Application pratique:

The party wall rights cease when the neighbouring building is removed. Sophie must negotiate a new agreement with the neighbour for any use of the wall (e.g., support for a new building). She should document the situation with photos and consult a notary to formalise co-ownership terms.

2

Shared garden wall becomes co-owned

Pierre and Marie share a garden wall in Nice (Nice) that was originally built as a party wall. Marie demolishes her garden shed attached to the wall, leaving only the wall standing.

Application pratique:

The wall no longer serves two buildings, so it ceases to be a party wall. Pierre and Marie now co-own the wall as an undivided asset. They must agree on maintenance costs and any future use. Pierre should request a written agreement specifying each party's share and rights.

3

Redevelopment after fire destroys adjacent building

In Marseille (Marseille), a fire destroys the apartment block next to Julien's building, leaving a party wall exposed. Julien wants to rebuild and use the wall for support.

Application pratique:

The party wall status ends with the destruction of the neighbouring building. Julien must obtain permission from the landowner of the destroyed building to use the wall. He should have a surveyor assess the wall's condition and negotiate a servitude or co-ownership agreement, formalised by a notarial deed.

Maître Cécile Zakine

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Cécile Zakine — Avocate au Barreau des Alpes-Maritimes, Docteur en Droit. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par les équipes de Maître Zakine.

Prendre rendez-vous →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Zakine, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse rapide