Reference decision: cc • No. 16-12.524 • 2017-11-22 • See the decision →
Imagine: you are the owner of a small business in Biscarrosse, in the Landes. A key employee tells you they are leaving their job without respecting their three-month notice period. You were counting on them to finish an important project, but they leave overnight. You therefore decide to claim from them a compensatory notice indemnity, as permitted by law. But a question nags at you: on this sum, must you pay holiday pay? The question seems technical, but it has very real financial consequences. This is exactly what the Court of Cassation decided in its judgment of 22 November 2017 (No. 16-12.524).
This decision answers a question that many employers ask: does the indemnity paid by the employee in the event of failure to observe their notice period give rise to holiday pay for the employer? In clear terms, if you receive a sum of money from a former employee because they did not work their notice, must you also pay them the corresponding holiday pay? The answer is no, and it is clear.
But what exactly does this change? Why is this distinction important? And how can you avoid finding yourself in a contentious situation? In this article, I will break down this reference decision, explain the applicable rules, and give you practical advice for managing a contract termination smoothly, whether you are an employer or an employee.
The facts: a story that happens every day
The case began with a dispute between an employee and his employer. Mr. X, a salesperson working for a company based in Saint-Paul-lès-Dax, decided to take formal notice of the termination of his employment contract on the grounds of his employer's fault. Taking formal notice (i.e., termination of the contract by the employee due to serious breaches by the employer) is a legal mechanism which, if justified, produces the effects of a dismissal without real and serious cause. In this case, the employee considered that his employer had not complied with his contractual obligations. He brought the matter before the employment tribunal to have the termination recognised and to obtain damages.
On the other hand, the employer contested the taking of formal notice and counterclaimed for payment of a compensatory notice indemnity, on the grounds that the employee had not worked his notice. The employer considered that, since the employee had left his post without notice, he must pay a sum equivalent to the salary he would have received during that period. Furthermore, the employer also claimed the holiday pay relating to this notice indemnity. In other words, the employer considered that the notice indemnity was a disguised salary and therefore should generate holiday pay entitlement.
The Court of Appeal upheld the employer on this point: it ordered the employee to pay the notice indemnity, and added the corresponding holiday pay. The employee appealed to the Court of Cassation. He argued that the notice indemnity was not salary but a fixed indemnity intended to compensate the loss suffered by the employer. Consequently, it could not give rise to holiday pay. The Court of Cassation had to decide this point of principle.
The reasoning of the court — broken down
The Court of Cassation quashed the Court of Appeal's decision. It recalled that, under Article L. 1234-1 of the Labour Code, the employer must pay a compensatory notice indemnity to the employee when the employer dismisses the employee without notice. But in the reverse case, when it is the employee who fails to observe their notice, the employer may claim a fixed indemnity from them. This indemnity is not salary: it is compensatory in nature, i.e., it aims to compensate the loss suffered by the employer due to the absence of notice.
In other words, the indemnity due by the employee to the employer in the event of failure to observe the notice period does not give rise to holiday pay for the employer. The Court of Cassation is clear: "The amount of the indemnity due by the employee to the employer in the event of failure to observe the notice period does not give rise to holiday pay for the employer." This principle is fundamental: holiday pay is attached to salary, not to a compensatory indemnity.
The High Court relied on the fact that the notice indemnity paid by the employee does not have the nature of salary. It does not correspond to consideration for work, but to compensation for the loss suffered by the employer. Consequently, the employer cannot require payment of holiday pay on this sum. This reasoning is consistent with the Court of Cassation's previous case law, which distinguishes sums of a salary nature from compensatory sums. In this case, the Court of Appeal had erred in considering that the notice indemnity was equivalent to salary.
This decision is a confirmation of the traditional position of the Court of Cassation. It reaffirms that holiday pay entitlements arise only from actual or deemed work (such as periods of holiday pay themselves). An indemnity paid as compensation for loss cannot generate holiday pay entitlements. This is a logical rule, but one that is sometimes overlooked by employers.
What this changes for you — concretely
For an employer, this decision means that you cannot claim from an employee the compensatory holiday pay on the notice indemnity they owe you. For example, if an employee leaves their job without notice and you claim €3,000 in notice indemnity, you cannot add €300 (10%) for holiday pay. This sum is purely compensatory.
For an employee, this decision is protective. If you are forced to pay a notice indemnity to your former employer, you do not have to pay the related holiday pay as well. This can represent a significant saving, especially if the notice period is long (several months of salary).
Let us take a concrete example in Saint-Paul-lès-Dax: an employee in retail with a monthly salary of €2,500 and a three-month notice period. If they leave their job without notice, the employer can claim €7,500 from them. Before this decision, some employers might have added €750 in holiday pay. Now, this is prohibited.
If you are in this situation, you must check whether the indemnity you are claiming or that is being claimed from you has a compensatory or salary nature. If in doubt, consult a lawyer lawyer. undefined, I have come across cases where employers tried to add holiday pay on all indemnities, which was abusive.
Four tips to avoid this type of dispute
- Draft the employment contract clearly: provide for the terms of notice and the consequences of non-compliance. State that the notice indemnity is fixed and does not give rise to holiday pay.
- In the event of termination, make a precise calculation: distinguish between sums due for notice actually worked (salary + holiday pay) and the indemnity for notice not taken (indemnity alone). Use payroll software or call on a chartered accountant.
- Keep all documents: termination letters, proof of failure to observe notice, detailed calculations. In the event of a dispute, you will need to prove the amount claimed.
- In case of disagreement, prioritise negotiation: a settlement agreement can avoid a costly trial. However, be careful: the settlement must be balanced and respect everyone's rights.
Further reading: related case law and developments
This decision is part of a consistent line of the Court of Cassation. For example, in a judgment of 13 September 2006 (No. 04-47.069), the Court had already ruled that the notice indemnity due by the employee was not subject to social security contributions because it did not have a salary nature. This position is consistent with the distinction between salary and indemnity.
On the other hand, there are cases where the indemnity paid by the employer to the employee (for example, in the event of dismissal without notice) gives rise to holiday pay. This is called the compensatory notice indemnity, which is deferred salary. The difference lies in the source of the obligation: in one case, it is compensation; in the other, it is salary.
The trend of the courts is therefore clear: compensatory sums, whether paid by the employer or by the employee, do not generate holiday pay entitlements. This case law is stable and should continue. For the future, it is unlikely that the Court of Cassation will depart from this principle, as it is based on a solid legal distinction.
Checklist before acting
FAQ: practical questions
- Can I claim holiday pay on the notice indemnity due from my employee? No, according to the Court of Cassation, this indemnity does not give rise to holiday pay for the employer.
- What should I do if my employer claims holiday pay from me on the notice indemnity? You can challenge it by relying on the judgment of 22 November 2017. Contact a lawyer to help you.
- What are the time limits for taking action? The limitation period for an action for payment of a notice indemnity is 2 years from the termination of the contract (Article L. 1471-1 of the Labour Code).
- How is the notice indemnity due from the employee calculated? It is equal to the amount of salary and benefits the employee would have received if they had worked during the notice period. It does not include holiday pay.
- Does this decision also apply to mutually agreed termination indemnities? No, mutually agreed termination is an amicable method of termination; the indemnity paid has a different nature. If in doubt, consult a lawyer.
Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Zakine (€45) can save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →
